The Classroom or the Internet?  Student Experiences and Research Results of a Supervision in Social Work Class

by

Robin Mama

Associate Professor

Monmouth University

Department of Social Work

Cedar Avenue, West Long Branch, NJ 07764 USA

rmama@monmouth.edu

Keywords

social work supervision, online course

Abstract

 This presentation provides an overview of a graduate social work supervision class presented in two formats: the traditional class with web-enhancement, and an online course.  Research findings from a pre-and pos-test conducted with the students will also be presented.

 Proposal (being revised)

     Social work education has definitely entered the technological arena.  Distance education has been in use for several years, and research has been conducted comparing student learning between the traditional classroom and distance education (Chute et.al., 1988; Cunningham, 1988; Douglass, 1989; Kabot & Friedel, 1990).  While social work education has taken a slower approach to distance education, the use of this medium is growing (Conklin & Osterndorf, 1995). Less has been written about the use of the Internet as an instructional medium in social work, although several articles have begun to report initial experiences with courses taught over the internet (Stocks & Freddolino, 1988; Schoech, 2000). 

      Students in a graduate social work elective, Supervision in Social Work, were pre-tested at the beginning of the semester on their attitudes towards the use of technology and the internet in social work.  (The pre-and post-tests used in this study were used with permission of Professor Dick Schoech, based on his research published in 2000). The students were then given a choice of class format: a traditional class with web enhancement, or an online course.  Of the total of 15 students enrolled, five students chose the traditional format; 10 chose the online format.  The class was conducted in both mediums, and a post-test was administered at the end of the semester.

      This informational presentation will provide details about the class, the web enhancement of the class, student experiences and research results.

Chute, A., L. Balthazar, C. Poston. 1988.  Learning from teletraining.  American Journal of Distance Education 2(3): 55-63.

Conklin, J.J. and W. Osterndorf. 1995.  Distance learning in continuing social work education: promise of the year 2000. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education 6(3):13-17.

Cunningham, B.M. 1988.  The telecourse as an alternative to a traditional in-class accounting course.  Community and Junior College Quarterly 12(3):205-12.

Douglas, P.J. 1989. Effectiveness of interactive satellite delivery versus traditional delivery in selected courses.  Annual Conference of Teaching at a Distance. University of Wisconson.

Kabat, E. and J. Friedel. 1990.  The development, pilot-testing, and dissemination of a comprehensive evaluation model for assessing the effectiveness of a two-way interactive distance learning system.  ERIC 332690.

Schoech, D. 2000. Teaching over the internet: results of one doctoral course. Research on Social Work Practice 10(4):467-486.

Stocks, J.T. and P. Freddolino. 1998. Evaluation of a world wide web-based graduate social work research methods course.  Computers in Human Services 15:51-69.